View source for Privacy Rights/Most countries

{{Right section
|right=Privacy Rights
|section=Legal Codification
|question=Most countries
|questionHeading=Is this right protected in the Constitutions of most countries today?
|pageLevel=Question
|contents=The right to privacy is a widely accepted right throughout the world. Currently, 186 constitutions around the globe include the right to privacy. Within these constitutions however, there are discrepancies in the language and what is considered to fall under the ‘right to privacy’ umbrella. In the most obvious cases, there is a considerable differentiation between the age of the constitutions being compared. For example, the United States has maintained the same Constitution since 1789 with its last alteration being the 27th Amendment in 1992. Privacy, however, was addressed in the 4th Amendment in 1791 which states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”(U.S. Constitution- Fourth Amendment). While formal alterations or additions to the US Constitution have been relatively scarce, the United States legal system, as it pertains to the Constitution, has evolved. Through judicial review, the Supreme Court has applied interpretations to the original document. We see this instance in the 1960 Supreme Court Case Griswold v. Connecticut. This landmark case ruled that the Constitution protected the right of marital privacy (Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)). This provides insight on how the US addresses rights, like the right to privacy, that are not explicitly stated in the Constitution. 

Looking at other countries suggests some of the range of approaches to the right to privacy. For an alternate example we can look to the current constitution of Albania. Albania’s active constitution was ratified in 1998 with the latest modification being made in 2016. Articles 35-37 of the constitution addresses the right to privacy in much broader scope than the United States, “No one may be obliged, except when the law requires it, to make public the data connected with his person,” (Constitute Project 2020) “The freedom and secrecy of correspondence or any other means of communication are guaranteed,” and “The inviolability of the residence is guaranteed.” (Constitute Project 2020) More is included within these articles but the three main points address the “data,” the communication, and the residence of the individual. Clearly, the language used in Albania’s constitution applies to a lot more aspects of one's privacy than the language used in the US constitution. With that said, the structure of Albania’s government differs from that of the United States, especially when it comes to the judicial system. Albania has a Supreme Court and a Constitutional Court. The latter is responsible for interpreting “the compatibility of international agreements with the mandates of the Constitution prior to their ratification; verifies compliance with the Constitution in legislative acts passed by local, regional and central government bodies; and adjudicates individual citizens’ claims of constitutional rights breaches and violations,” (“Researching the Albanian Legal System” 2019). Furthermore, “Judicial review by the Constitutional Court may be requested upon petitions submitted by the President of the Republic, the Prime Minister, 1/5th of Parliament’s members, the Head of High State Control as well as any lower court,” (“Researching the Albanian Legal System” 2019). A specific example of this occurred in 2008 as law no. 9887, “On Protection of Personal Data,” expanded and defined privacy rights as it pertained to personal data. This was brought forward by the Council of Ministers, which falls under the executive branch of the Albanian government. This same law was then subsequently amended in 2012 and 2014 to modify the right to privacy in an era of technology. We can see these protections in action as six different multinational companies were fined in April of 2024 for violating Albania's privacy rights (“Albania” 2024). In Albania, there are more avenues for other branches of government to directly bring forward issues of constitutionality and, as we have seen with law no. 9887, propose new legislation meant to refine or analyze contemporary applications of constitutional law. Additionally, justices, for both the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court, serve for a single term of 9 years. This is just another factor in how constitutional rights are interpreted and applied. In 2020, Algeria enacted its current constitution which shares similar constitutional provisions on the right to privacy. In articles 47 and 48 it confirms that, “Every person shall have the right to the protection of his honor and private life. Every person shall have the right to the confidentiality of his correspondence and private communications in all their forms…The protection of individuals when handling personal data shall be a fundamental right.” (Constitute Project 2020).  

Another longstanding constitution, that of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, was originally enacted in 1814 but has been subsequently amended up until the year 2008. Articles 10, 12, and 13 state, “Everyone shall have the right to respect for his privacy, without prejudice to restrictions laid down by or pursuant to Act of Parliament,”(Constitute Project 2020) “Entry into a home against the will of the occupant shall be permitted only in the cases laid down by or pursuant to Act of Parliament, by those designated for the purpose by or pursuant to Act of Parliament,”(Constitute Project 2020) and “The privacy of correspondence shall not be violated except in the cases laid down by Act of Parliament, by order of the courts. The privacy of the telephone and telegraph shall not be violated except, in the cases laid down by Act of Parliament, by or with the authorization of those designated for the purpose by Act of Parliament.” (Constitute Project 2020) Again, there is more included within the official articles, but the main points are delivered. Communication and residence are clearly stated but one's data, as proclaimed by the previous two constitutions, is not explicitly stated. We can also look towards Somalia’s constitution which was enacted in 2012 that states, “The home and other dwellings of the person shall be inviolable, and their entry, search or surveillance shall not be allowed without a reasoned order from a judge. Any such order must be read properly to the occupier of the dwelling before entry, and the inspecting authority is prohibited to violate the law,” (Constitute Project 2020). Here, the right to privacy explicitly secures one’s home but not much else. How one’s “other dwellings” are officially defined is not included in the country’s constitution. So, in looking at these examples, and various others, it is hard to definitively define the extent of one's “right to privacy” as there is no international consensus and the language used in many constitutions worldwide are not cut and dry. Furthermore, while the age of a country’s constitution may be a factor, how their political system is structured is also an important consideration when determining the scope of this right. 

References:

Congress.gov. 2022. “U.S. Constitution - Fourth Amendment - Resources - Constitution
Annotated - Congress.gov - Library of Congress.” Constitution.congress.gov. Constitution
Annotated. 2022. https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/.

“Researching the Albanian Legal System.” n.d. GlobaLex - Foreign and International Law
Research. Accessed July 30,
2024. https://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/Albania1.html#thejudi.

“Albania.” n.d. DataGuidance. Accessed July 30, 2024.
https://www.dataguidance.com/jurisdiction/albania.

Read. 2020. “Read about ‘Right to Privacy’ on Constitute.” Constituteproject.org. 2020.
https://www.constituteproject.org/constitutions?key=privacy.

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
}}