Freedom of Expression/Philosophical Origins/Tradition contributions/Marxism: Difference between revisions
Import-sysop (talk | contribs) (transformed) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|question=Tradition contributions | |question=Tradition contributions | ||
|questionHeading=What have religious and philosophical traditions contributed to our understanding of this right? | |questionHeading=What have religious and philosophical traditions contributed to our understanding of this right? | ||
|breakout=Marxism | |||
|pageLevel=Breakout | |pageLevel=Breakout | ||
|contents=Free expression is not a central tenet of Marxism. However, Marx’s early writings display a distaste for censorship. In 1842 he wrote that “the real, radical cure for the censorship would be its abolition” (Marx 1842). Though he strays from this topic in his later writing, he never repudiated his earlier opinions (Heinze 2018). Heinze argues that the idea that Marxism is inherently anti-free-speech is a misconception (regardless of how some specific Marxist regimes have operated). Marx rejected some rights - property rights - because they served the interests of the wealthy and powerful. But free speech is different because it does not serve an underlying interest that Marx opposed. | |||
|contents= | Marx 1842: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1842/02/10.htm | ||
Free expression is not a central tenet of Marxism. However, Marx’s early writings display a distaste for censorship. | Heinze 2018: http://humanityjournal.org/blog/karl-marxs-theory-of-free-speech-part-1/#_ftn5 | ||
Marx | |||
Heinze | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 12:07, 6 February 2023
What have religious and philosophical traditions contributed to our understanding of this right?
Marxism
Free expression is not a central tenet of Marxism. However, Marx’s early writings display a distaste for censorship. In 1842 he wrote that “the real, radical cure for the censorship would be its abolition” (Marx 1842). Though he strays from this topic in his later writing, he never repudiated his earlier opinions (Heinze 2018). Heinze argues that the idea that Marxism is inherently anti-free-speech is a misconception (regardless of how some specific Marxist regimes have operated). Marx rejected some rights - property rights - because they served the interests of the wealthy and powerful. But free speech is different because it does not serve an underlying interest that Marx opposed. Marx 1842: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1842/02/10.htm Heinze 2018: http://humanityjournal.org/blog/karl-marxs-theory-of-free-speech-part-1/#_ftn5