Freedom of Religion/Philosophical Origins/Tradition contributions/Millian Utilitarianism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Import-sysop (talk | contribs) (transformed) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|question=Tradition contributions | |question=Tradition contributions | ||
|questionHeading=What have religious and philosophical traditions contributed to our understanding of this right? | |questionHeading=What have religious and philosophical traditions contributed to our understanding of this right? | ||
|breakout=Millian Utilitarianism | |||
|pageLevel=Breakout | |pageLevel=Breakout | ||
|contents=In On Liberty, Mill argued against any attempt to impose religion on another person: | |||
|contents= | “The notion that it is one man’s duty that another should be religious, was the foundation of all the religious persecutions ever perpetrated, and, if admitted, would fully justify them. Though the feeling which breaks out in the repeated attempts to stop railway travelling on Sunday, in the resistance to the opening of Museums, and the like, has not the cruelty of the old persecutors, the state of mind indicated by it is fundamentally the same” (Mill 1859, 84). | ||
“The notion that it is one man’s duty that another should be religious, was the foundation of all the religious persecutions ever perpetrated, and, if admitted, would fully justify them. Though the feeling which breaks out in the repeated attempts to stop railway travelling on Sunday, in the resistance to the opening of Museums, and the like, has not the cruelty of the old persecutors, the state of mind indicated by it is fundamentally the same” (Mill | |||
REFERENCES: | |||
On Liberty: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/mill/liberty.pdf | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:18, 27 February 2023
What have religious and philosophical traditions contributed to our understanding of this right?
Millian Utilitarianism
In On Liberty, Mill argued against any attempt to impose religion on another person: “The notion that it is one man’s duty that another should be religious, was the foundation of all the religious persecutions ever perpetrated, and, if admitted, would fully justify them. Though the feeling which breaks out in the repeated attempts to stop railway travelling on Sunday, in the resistance to the opening of Museums, and the like, has not the cruelty of the old persecutors, the state of mind indicated by it is fundamentally the same” (Mill 1859, 84).
REFERENCES:
On Liberty: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/mill/liberty.pdf