Freedom of Association/History/Noteworthy written sources: Difference between revisions

From
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
m (Reverted edits by Jkochan1 (talk) to last revision by Import-sysop)
Tag: Rollback
Line 5: Line 5:
|questionHeading=Is there another noteworthy written source from the past that mentions this right?
|questionHeading=Is there another noteworthy written source from the past that mentions this right?
|pageLevel=Question
|pageLevel=Question
|contents=Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum ([[Probable year::1891]]) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought.  
|contents=Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum ([[Probable year:: 1891]]) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought.  


"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."
"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."


References:


Rerum Novarum, Encyclical of Pope Leo XII On Capital and Labor
}}
}}

Revision as of 18:41, 5 September 2023

Is there another noteworthy written source from the past that mentions this right?

Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum (1891) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought.

"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."