Privacy Rights/History/Country sources/United Kingdom: Difference between revisions
Import-sysop (talk | contribs) (transformed) |
Import-sysop (talk | contribs) (transformed) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|pageLevel=Breakout | |pageLevel=Breakout | ||
|breakout=United Kingdom | |breakout=United Kingdom | ||
|contents=The United Kingdom [[Probable year::1988]] Human Rights Act entrenched the ECHR into United Kingdom law (Liberty, “The Human Rights Act”). It protects one’s privacy from unnecessary intrusion, among other rights. Additionally, in ‘’The Right to Privacy’’ Warren and Brandeis cite Lord Cottenham in [[Probable year::1820]] who, in agreement with Lord Eldon, felt that were a king’s illnesses recorded by a doctor and published while that king was still alive, a court would not permit its publishing, as he claimed this circumstance would breach the king’s privacy (Warren & Brandeis, [[Probable year::1890]], 205; Bycer, [[Probable year::2014]]) . | |contents=The United Kingdom [[Probable year:: 1988]] Human Rights Act entrenched the ECHR into United Kingdom law (Liberty, “The Human Rights Act”). It protects one’s privacy from unnecessary intrusion, among other rights. Additionally, in ‘’The Right to Privacy’’ Warren and Brandeis cite Lord Cottenham in [[Probable year:: 1820]] who, in agreement with Lord Eldon, felt that were a king’s illnesses recorded by a doctor and published while that king was still alive, a court would not permit its publishing, as he claimed this circumstance would breach the king’s privacy (Warren & Brandeis, [[Probable year:: 1890]], 205; Bycer, [[Probable year:: 2014]]) . | ||
https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/your-rights/the-human-rights-act/ | https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/your-rights/the-human-rights-act/ | ||
Bycer, M. ([[Probable year::2014]]) . Understanding the [[Probable year::1890]] Warren and Brandeis “The Right to Privacy” Article. National Juris University. Retrieved Sept. 10, [[Probable year::2021]], from https://nationalparalegal.edu/UnderstandingWarrenBrandeis.aspx | Bycer, M. ([[Probable year:: 2014]]) . Understanding the [[Probable year:: 1890]] Warren and Brandeis “The Right to Privacy” Article. National Juris University. Retrieved Sept. 10, [[Probable year:: 2021]], from https://nationalparalegal.edu/UnderstandingWarrenBrandeis.aspx | ||
Warren, S. & Brandeis, L. ([[Probable year::1890]], Dec. 15). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5), 193-220. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0017-811X%281890[[Probable year::1215]]% 294%3A5%3C193%3ATRTP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C | Warren, S. & Brandeis, L. ([[Probable year:: 1890]], Dec. 15). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5), 193-220. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0017-811X%281890[[Probable year:: 1215]]% 294%3A5%3C193%3ATRTP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:12, 28 December 2022
What is the oldest written source in this country that mentions this right?
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom 1988 Human Rights Act entrenched the ECHR into United Kingdom law (Liberty, “The Human Rights Act”). It protects one’s privacy from unnecessary intrusion, among other rights. Additionally, in ‘’The Right to Privacy’’ Warren and Brandeis cite Lord Cottenham in 1820 who, in agreement with Lord Eldon, felt that were a king’s illnesses recorded by a doctor and published while that king was still alive, a court would not permit its publishing, as he claimed this circumstance would breach the king’s privacy (Warren & Brandeis, 1890, 205; Bycer, 2014) .
https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/your-rights/the-human-rights-act/ Bycer, M. (2014) . Understanding the 1890 Warren and Brandeis “The Right to Privacy” Article. National Juris University. Retrieved Sept. 10, 2021, from https://nationalparalegal.edu/UnderstandingWarrenBrandeis.aspx Warren, S. & Brandeis, L. (1890, Dec. 15). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5), 193-220. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0017-811X%2818901215% 294%3A5%3C193%3ATRTP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C